CULTURE BRANDS UNIVERSITIES UNITED NATIONS
HOME SUBSCRIBE ABOUT US CONTACT US




Content Authenticity Initiative



Citi Times



Quick March



UNESCO CREATIVE CITIES NETWORK






UNIVERSITIES


UNIVERSITIES

October 16, 2021

Oxford India Centre for Sustainable Development awards scholarships to eight Indian students


University of Oxford


Photo: An Announcement from the Oxford India Centre for Sustainable Development (OICSD) at Somerville College, University of Oxford.


Oxford, UK. October 16, 2021 — The Oxford India Centre for Sustainable Development (OICSD) at Somerville College, University of Oxford, has awarded scholarships to eight Indian students. They will take their places at the University of Oxford in October 2021. The students will pursue research on India’s sustainable development topics ranging from solar cells and renewable energy to the role of diverse communities in shaping urban landscapes in South Asia.

Including the existing scholars, the OICSD cohort for the academic year 2021-22 has grown to 21 students - which is the largest cohort of scholars the Centre has supported since its inception in 2013.

Candidates are selected based on their academic merit and the alignment of their work with the Centre’s impact themes such as climate change, energy, cities, healthcare technology, biodiversity, and conservation, among others.

The Centre has funded the postgraduate studies of a total of 43 Indian students to date. Most of these have returned to India upon their graduation to work in law, governance, conservation, and social development, thereby carrying forward the Centre’s ambition of developing ‘brain gain’ for India.

This year, the Centre has awarded the prestigious Indira Gandhi scholarships to Snigdha Lal and Karthik Ganesh to pursue their DPhil research in Condensed Matter Physics and Inorganic Chemistry.

Snigdha Lal would research the fundamental properties of various solar cells. “I want to use my research to create the greatest impact in the field of clean energy, especially for countries such as India,” said Snigdha, who previously did her undergraduate studies in IIT-Bombay and master’s in chemical engineering at TU Delft, Netherlands.

The Indira Gandhi scholarships were instituted at the OICSD through a joint endowment by the Government of India and the University of Oxford to research the challenges and opportunities of sustainable development in India.

The Centre has also awarded the Gopal Subramanium scholarship to Swapnil Tripathi for pursuing a DPhil in Law.

This year, the OICSD has awarded Indira Gandhi-Radhakrishnan scholarships to Mrinalini Mitra and Sumedha Chakravarthy to pursue a one-year master’s degree in Modern South Asian Studies.

Each year, the Centre awards partial scholarships for postgraduate studies in law through generous donations from Mr. Sarosh Zaiwalla, Senior Partner and Founder of Zaiwalla & Co, and Mr. Hemant Sahai, Founding Partner of HSA Advocates. The supporters of the Cornelia Sorabji Scholarship are distinguished friends from the Indian legal and business community. They include Dr. Pheroza Godrej, Senior Counsel Darius J Khambata, and Senior Advocate Harin Raval.

This year, the Ratanshaw Bomanji Zaiwalla scholarship was awarded to Sarvatrajit Singh Jajmann for an MSc in Law and Finance. In addition, the HSA Advocates scholarship and the Cornelia Sorabji scholarship were awarded to Avani Agarwal and Shubrojyoti Mookherjee, respectively, for the BCL degree.

The Oxford India Centre for Sustainable Development (OICSD) is a unique Oxford-India partnership created to advance research on the complex challenges and opportunities posed by sustainable development in India.

The Oxford India Centre for Sustainable Development will help shape the next century of India’s growth by educating, connecting, and supporting its future leaders in sustainable development and by forging lasting partnerships between Indian institutions and the University of Oxford.

Source: Oxford India Centre for Sustainable Development, Somerville College, University of Oxford.

|GlobalGiants.Com|

— The editor is an Oxford Alumni Card Holder and an Oxford & Cambridge Society of India Member.


Prince Charles Visits OICSD

Edited & Posted by the Editor | 5:33 AM | View the original post



October 13, 2021

NASA Sets Landing Coverage for Russian Cosmonaut, Actress, Producer


NASA


NASA


Photo: The Soyuz MS-19 crew ship carrying three Russian crew members approaches the International Space Station for a docking to the Rassvet module. Aboard the spacecraft were Soyuz Commander and veteran cosmonaut Anton Shkaplerov, actress Yulia Peresild, and producer Klim Shipenko. October 5, 2021. Image Credit: NASA.


NASA


Photo: Soyuz MS-19 crew members (from left) Yulia Peresild, Anton Shkaplerov, and Klim Shipenko pose for a portrait at the Gagarin Cosmonaut Training Center in Russia. Shkaplerov is a Roscosmos cosmonaut and the Soyuz Commander visiting the International Space Station for the fourth time. Peresild and Shipenko are spaceflight participants and first-time space flyers representing Russia. August 26, 2021. Image Credit: NASA.


NASA


Photo: Spaceflight participant and Soyuz MS-19 Board Engineer Yulia Peresild poses for a portrait at the Gagarin Cosmonaut Training Center in Russia. August 26, 2021. Image Credit: NASA.


WASHINGTON, October 12, 2021 — NASA will provide complete coverage as three space travelers living aboard the International Space Station, including a Russian actress and her producer-director, return to Earth just after midnight on Sunday, October 17.

Russian cosmonaut Oleg Novitskiy of Roscosmos will be at the controls of the Soyuz MS-18 spacecraft, flanked by Russian actress Yulia Peresild and Russian producer-director Klim Shipenko, for the spacecraft’s undocking from the station’s Nauka Multipurpose Laboratory Module Saturday, October 16. The trio will make a parachute-assisted landing on the steppe of Kazakhstan a little more than three hours later, at 12:36 a.m. EDT (10:36 a.m. Kazakhstan time) Sunday, October 17.

Coverage of the crew’s farewells and hatch closure, undocking, and landing will air live on NASA TV, the agency’s website, and the NASA app.

After landing, the crew will return by Russian helicopters to the recovery staging city in Karaganda, Kazakhstan, before boarding a Gagarin Cosmonaut Training Center aircraft to return to their training base in Star City, Russia.

Peresild and Shipenko arrived at the station on October 5 aboard the Soyuz MS-19 spacecraft with Russian cosmonaut Anton Shkaplerov for 12 days filming their movie, “Challenge,” under a commercial agreement between Roscosmos and Moscow-based media entities. They served as spaceflight participants during their stay on the orbital complex.

Novitskiy returns to Earth after 191 days in space on his third mission that spanned 3,056 orbits of Earth and 80.9 million miles.

When the Soyuz undocks, Expedition 66 will formally begin aboard the station. Commander Thomas Pesquet of ESA (European Space Agency), NASA astronauts Shane Kimbrough, Megan McArthur, Mark Vande Hei, JAXA (Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency) astronaut Akihiko Hoshide, and Roscosmos cosmonauts Shkaplerov and Pyotr Dubrov will remain aboard the orbiting outpost.

Source: NASA

|GlobalGiants.Com|

Edited & Posted by the Editor | 10:42 AM | View the original post



October 12, 2021

IMF announces its World Economic Outlook October 2021 Forecast


International Monetary Fund


Photo: International Monetary Fund World Economic Outlook. Chief Economist Gita Gopinath, Division Chief in the IMF Research Department, prepares to provide the World Economic Outlook during the 2021 Annual Meetings at the International Monetary Fund. October 12, 2021. Washington, DC, United States. IMF Photo/Joshua Roberts.


Washington, DC. October 12, 2021 —The IMF is lowering its global growth projection for 2021 slightly to 5.9 percent while keeping it unchanged for 2022 at 4.9 percent. However, this modest headline revision masks significant downgrades for some countries, the Fund reports in its World Economic Outlook released Tuesday (October 12) in Washington, DC.

“The global recovery continues, but momentum has weakened, hobbled by the pandemic. As a result, we have a slight downward revision for global growth for this year to 5.9 percent for next year. Our projection remains unchanged at 4.9 percent. However, the divergences in growth prospects across countries persist and remain a major concern,” said Gita Gopinath, Economic Counsellor and Director of the Research Department at the International Monetary Fund.

Gopinath added that risks to economic prospects have increased, and policy trade-offs have become more complex in the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic. As a result, monetary policy will need to walk a fine line between tackling inflation and financial risks and supporting economic recovery.

“One of the major risks remains that there could be new variants of the virus that could further slow back the recovery. In addition, we’re seeing major supply disruptions worldwide that are also feeding inflationary pressures, which are quite high. Further, financial risk-taking also is increasing, which poses an additional risk to the outlook,” explained Gopinath.

The dangerous divergence in economic prospects across countries remains a significant concern. These divergences are a consequence of the ‘great vaccine divide’ and large disparities in policy support.

“The foremost priority is to vaccinate the world. Much greater multilateral action is needed to vaccinate at least 40 percent of the population in every country by the end of this year. And 70 percent by the middle of next year. We also need much greater action to address climate change. Individual countries will need to tailor their fiscal and monetary policy to the country’s specific conditions, to the health conditions in their country, to their economic conditions, while also maintaining the credibility of their fiscal and monetary frameworks,” said Gopinath.

Source: IMF

|GlobalGiants.Com|

Edited & Posted by the Editor | 3:13 PM | View the original post



October 11, 2021

The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences announces the Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences 2021


Nobel Prize in Economics 2021


Photo: David Card, Jousha Angrist and Guido Imbens. The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel 2021. Image provided by & Credit: © Nobel Prize Outreach 2021 Ill. Niklas Elmehed.


Nobel Prize in Economics 2021


Nobel Prize in Economics 2021


Stockholm, October 11, 2021 — The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences has decided to award the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel 2021.

With one half to —

David Card
The University of California, Berkeley, USA

“For his empirical contributions to labor economics.”

And the other half jointly to —

Joshua D. Angrist
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA

Guido W. Imbens
Stanford University, USA

“For their methodological contributions to the analysis of causal relationships.”


• Natural experiments help answer important questions for society.

This year’s Laureates - David Card, Joshua Angrist, and Guido Imbens - have provided new insights into the labor market. They have shown what conclusions about cause and effect one can draw from natural experiments. Their approach has spread to other fields and revolutionized empirical research.

Many of the big questions in the social sciences deal with cause and effect. How does immigration affect pay and employment levels? How does a more comprehensive education affect someone’s future income? These questions are difficult to answer because we have nothing to use as a comparison. We do not know what would have happened if there had been less immigration or if that person had not continued studying.

However, this year’s Laureates have shown that it is possible to answer these questions using natural experiments. The key is to handle situations in which chance events or policy changes result in groups of people being treated differently in a way that resembles clinical trials in medicine.

Using natural experiments, David Card has analyzed the labor market effects of minimum wages, immigration, and education. His studies from the early 1990s challenged conventional wisdom, leading to new analyses and additional insights. The results showed, among other things, that increasing the minimum wage does not necessarily lead to fewer jobs. In addition, we now know that the incomes of people born in a country can benefit from new immigration, while people who immigrated at an earlier time risk being negatively affected. Finally, we have also realized that resources in schools are far more critical for students’ future labor market success than was previously thought.

Data from a natural experiment is difficult to interpret, however. For example, extending compulsory education by a year for one group of students (but not another) will not affect everyone in that group in the same way. Moreover, some students would have kept studying anyway and, for them, the value of education is often not representative of the entire group. So, is it even possible to draw any conclusions about the effect of an extra year in school? In the mid-1990s, Joshua Angrist and Guido Imbens solved this methodological problem, demonstrating precise conclusions about cause and effect from natural experiments.

“Card’s studies of core questions for society and Angrist and Imbens’ methodological contributions have shown that natural experiments are a rich source of knowledge. Moreover, their research has substantially improved our ability to answer critical causal questions, which has been of great benefit to society,” Peter Fredriksson, chair of the Economic Sciences Prize Committee, stated.

Source: The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences

|GlobalGiants.Com|

Edited & Posted by the Editor | 11:23 AM | View the original post



October 8, 2021

Punjab Central University Vice-Chancellor chairs the Technical Session at India Ministry of Education Webinar on Good Governance.



India Education Webinar


Photo: The Union Minister for Education, Skill Development, and Entrepreneurship, Mr. Dharmendra Pradhan, and the Minister of State for Education, Ms. Annpurna Devi, released the ‘One-year New Education Policy (NEP) - 2020 Achievement’ booklet in New Delhi on August 24, 2021. [File Photo]


New Delhi, October 7, 2021 — The Ministry of Education of India and the University Grants Commission (UGC) organized a webinar on Collective Partnership today. The webinar was a part of a series of webinars scheduled by the Government of India on Good Governance from September 17, 2021, to October 7, 2021. Union Minister of Education and Skill Development, Dharmendra Pradhan; Union Minister of Commerce & Industry, Piyush Goyal; Secretary, Higher Education, Sanjay Murthy; Chairman, UGC, Prof D.P Singh, and senior officials of the Ministry and UGC attended the webinar.

Mr. Dharmendra Pradhan highlighted the importance of good governance. He said that during the covid pandemic, India was one of the leading countries to offer a helping hand to the world. He added that the next 25 years would be crucial for future generations to lead the country towards a more glorious future.

The Minister emphasized the importance of people’s participation in making a self-reliant India. “People’s Participation” is a crucial pillar of Modi Government’s governance model,” he added.

Union Minister of Commerce & Industry, Piyush Goyal, said that the world is looking at India as a trusted partner for a skilled workforce with enormous education possibilities attracting foreign institutions and students to come to India as their preferred study destination.

Mr. Sanjay Murthy, Secretary, Higher Education, highlighted the importance of the National Education Policy 2020 and its alignment to delivering good governance while focusing on the collaborative partnership of government departments, NGOs, civil societies, private players, and most importantly, the ordinary person.

In his Opening Remarks, Prof. D.P. Singh, Chairman of the University Grants Commission (UGC), talked about improving the quality of India’s education system.

The webinar on Collective Partnership helped bring together people from academic institutions, Ministries, and educationists to share a platform for furthering discussion on Good Governance.

Prof. R.P. Tiwari, Vice-Chancellor, Central University of Punjab, chaired the Technical Session. Prof. R.P. Tiwari is well known for his various other roles. For example, he is the Chairman of the Government Committee for recommending “Governance Reforms” in Chandigarh’s local, Panjab University.

The webinar deliberated on issues of Good Governance with a focus on the role of collective effort and partnership for achieving the same. The discussions focused on strategies that would enable and promote cooperative collaboration to realize the goals of the National Education Policy, 2020. An important takeaway of the webinar was the significance of collaborative partnership to empower people, improve the education system, boost economic growth, and ultimately leave no one behind. Discussions and ideas shared from the webinar will help fulfill the goals of delivering good governance in education.

Source: Ministry of Education, Government of India

|GlobalGiants.Com|

Edited & Posted by the Editor | 4:30 AM | View the original post



October 6, 2021

Prime Minister Narendra Modi meets the CEO of QS Quacquarelli Symonds.


QS


QS, Narendra Modi


Photo: New Delhi, India, October 5, 2021. Prime Minister Narendra Modi met Nunzio Quacquarelli, CEO and Managing Director of QS Quacquarelli Symonds Ltd. They discussed higher education.

“Had a productive meeting with Nunzio Quacquarelli, the CEO and Managing Director of QS Quacquarelli Symonds Ltd. We talked at length about aspects relating to the education sector,” Prime Minister Narendra Modi said in a tweet.

QS Quacquarelli Symonds is a leading provider of services, analytics, and insight to global higher education.

The QS World University Rankings portfolio, inaugurated in 2004, is a popular source of comparative data about the performance of universities.

Source: Narendra Modi/Twitter

|GlobalGiants.Com|

Edited & Posted by the Editor | 9:50 AM | View the original post



September 29, 2021

New York City Mayor, de Blasio, announces Columbia University will operate and oversee Pandemic Response Institute.

Pandemic Response Institute (PRI) allocated $20 Million in City Funding, tasked with Preparing Communities Ahead of the Next Pandemic.


Columbia University


City University of New York


NEW YORK, September 29, 2021 — Today, Mayor Bill de Blasio, New York City Economic Development Corporation (NYCEDC), and New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH) announced Pandemic Response Institute (PRI). Columbia University would launch and operate it. The City University of New York (CUNY) Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy (CUNY SPH) will be a crucial partner.

A broad consortium of non-profit public health entities, community-based organizations, industries, and businesses will work with the Institute to prevent, prepare for, respond to, and recover from public health emergencies.

The PRI (Pandemic Response Institute) will get up to $20 million in City capital funding for eligible costs. It would prepare New York City for future health emergencies and epidemics more effectively and equitably. In addition, it would position the city as a global leader to serve as a model for public health response.

“The Pandemic Response Institute, operated by Columbia University with key partner CUNY SPH, will play a critical role in preparing for future pandemics and promoting equity in public health,” said Mayor Bill de Blasio. “Born out of New York’s quick action during the early days of the pandemic, this institute will put our hardest learned lessons to work so that when the next public health crisis emerges, New York City will not only be prepared; we will be ready to lead these global fights.”

“The Pandemic Response Institute will serve as our City’s anchor as we invest and ensure we have the tools we need to confront — and prevent — future public health emergencies,” said Deputy Mayor for Housing and Economic Development Vicki Been. “We are grateful to our partners at Columbia and CUNY SPH for putting forth an ambitious and comprehensive vision for such an urgent need for New York City.”

“The experience of confronting COVID-19 and recent natural disasters has proven that we must work together to prepare and respond to public health emergencies,” said First Deputy Health Commissioner and Chief Equity Officer Dr. Torian Easterling. “These investments will prepare us to fight future health crises and ensure a just recovery and the opportunity to establish New York City as the public health capital of the world.”

“One of the lessons we’ve learned over the last 18 months during the COVID-19 pandemic is the importance of a robust public health emergency response system,” said Emergency Management Commissioner John Scrivani. “The partnership with Columbia University and the other institutions will make the Pandemic Response Institute a hub of innovation, information, and planning to prepare us for the next health crisis better. A dedicated institute to analyze and plan for future crises, along with resources and collaboration with City agencies, will help minimize the impact of future disasters and strengthen our public health responses.”

“Our commitment to building a recovery for all of us includes ensuring a robust public health response to any future emergency,” said the City’s Senior Advisor for Recovery, Lorraine Grillo. “We look forward to working with Columbia and CUNY to bolster our city’s infrastructure, so we are better prepared to swiftly and equitably address any threat to the well-being of our communities.”

“Columbia University with key partner CUNY SPH demonstrated to us a high level of expertise that was unmatched,” said NYCEDC President and CEO Rachel Loeb. “NYCEDC has every confidence these esteemed institutions and their partners will put New York City and all New Yorkers first. Keeping people safe and our economy open means we need an unprecedented public health response that is forward-looking and dedicated to addressing health disparities. NYCEDC is proud to help establish a Pandemic Response Institute that will be innovative and critical to our public health infrastructure.”

“The COVID-19 pandemic has opened our eyes to the critical need for strong and vibrant multi-sector partnerships to protect New Yorkers from emergent health threats effectively,” said Wafaa El-Sadr. El-Sadr is Professor of Epidemiology and Medicine at Columbia’s Mailman School of Public Health and Director of ICAP and Columbia World Projects. He is leading the PRI. “The Pandemic Response Institute will create an unprecedented nexus for engagement, expertise, and resources from across our city,” he added.

“We are enormously excited to partner with Columbia University in this vital effort,” said Ayman El-Mohandes, Dean of CUNY SPH. “Our school’s primary commitment to health equity and social justice, coupled with existing strengths in health communication, systems modeling, and community outreach, will help to shape and support this initiative to advance a new vision for the health of all New Yorkers.”

NYCEDC (New York City Economic Development Corporation), DOHMH (The New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene), and New York City Emergency Management reviewed and selected Columbia to launch this Institute with a critical partnership with CUNY SPH and other collaborators, following a Request for Proposals (RFP) in April. Through its Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University put forth an ambitious and compelling vision for the PRI.

The PRI will specifically focus on:

Dr. Claire Pomeroy, President and CEO of the Lasker Foundation, remarked, “Thanks to the Pandemic Response Institute, we are better positioned to build a healthier, more resilient, and more just New York City — and serve as a model for the world.”

Source: The City of New York, Office of the Mayor

|GlobalGiants.Com|

Edited & Posted by the Editor | 10:42 PM | View the original post



World Leaders, CEOs, & Global Celebrities Gather at Harvard University for the HPAIR Summit


Harvard

HPAIR-Meeting-02.jpg



CAMBRIDGE, Mass., Sept. 28, 2021 — The Harvard College Project for Asian and International Relations (HPAIR) that operates the largest student-run conference in the USA and Asia has concluded its flagship HPAIR 2021 Conference. It was the most extensive gathering in its 30-year history. The summit’s theme was Reinventing with Resilience, where attendees shared visions on improving the state of the world following COVID-19 by engaging in disruptive innovation across social, political, academic, and business dimensions.

Government ministers, Fortune 500 business CEOs, and decorated celebrities listed below gathered at Harvard University.

• Notable keynote speakers for the event included:

“Our core focus has always been to gather people who are pioneers in their respective fields and engage them in Socratic dialogue with one another on issues of global importance. And then to capture those ideas generated and share them worldwide,” remarked Zeel Patel, Co-President of HPAIR. “It creates a mesocosm of information transfer that only happens when two leaders interact, such as the CEO of The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Co-Founder of Wikipedia.”

Lesly Goh, former CTO of The World Bank Group and member of HPAIR’s Board of Advisors, applauded the global team on their achievements: “it was quite a pleasure to support Zeel, Eric, and their team of 75 Harvard students as they orchestrated the conference from their Dubai, Boston, and Taipei offices. While the virtual format brought on tremendous challenges, it also provided incredible opportunities to maximize HPAIR’s impact and accelerate our mission of democratizing insights to our delegates, connecting young future leaders with leaders globally.”

The Harvard College Project for Asian and International Relations (HPAIR) is a 30-year-old non-profit organization founded to create a forum of exchange for young professionals and current world leaders to discuss and learn about the most important technological, political, and economic issues facing the globe. The mission is to connect today’s top leaders with the future leaders of tomorrow in a dynamic forum of engagement.

Since 1991, HPAIR has organized 50 conferences in 19 different host countries, touching the lives of more than 40,000 students and young professionals. In addition, HPAIR hosts two student-led conferences a year, one on Harvard’s campus and one in Asia-Pacific.

Source: Harvard Project for Asian and International Relations (HPAIR)

|GlobalGiants.Com|

Edited & Posted by the Editor | 9:19 AM | View the original post



September 28, 2021

Bloomberg Businessweek's 2021-2022 Best B-Schools MBA Ranking

BloombergBusiness-001.jpg

BloombergRutgerMBA-002.jpg


Photo: The Rutgers MBA Program received high scores for the compensation of its graduates, the strength of its networking, and its diversity, according to the latest Bloomberg Businessweek ranking. Image provided by Rutgers Business School.


New York, September 26, 2021 — Bloomberg Businessweek’s has published its Best B-Schools MBA Ranking 2021-2022. Bloomberg ranked 119 business schools worldwide.

According to Bloomberg, all schools were required to submit employment data for the Class of 2020, following standards set by MBA CSEA, a trade group founded in 1994 to establish and collect consistent, comparable, peer-reviewed data.

Bloomberg Businessweek said its Best B-Schools ranking starts with a basic premise: The best judges of MBA programs are graduating students, recent alumni, and companies that recruit MBAs. And we want the best answers: Are schools offering what millennial students need, especially amid the Covid-19 pandemic? Are recent graduates able to leverage what they’ve learned and tapped into their schools’ networks? What do businesses value most in recruits?

“We learned that the major stakeholders — students, alumni, and recruiters — could have differing and overlapping needs and interests. So we rank schools based on four indexes that capture key elements of business school education: Compensation, Learning, Networking, and Entrepreneurship,” Bloomberg explained.

“For the 2021-22 ranking, we added a fifth index for U.S. schools: Diversity. For the first time, schools are providing data on race, ethnicity, and gender in their classes in a standardized way we can measure,” Bloomberg added.

“Our methodology involves two steps. Step 1 generates weightings for each index. We let the stakeholders decide rather than assign the indexes relative weightings ourselves. In our surveys, we asked students, alumni, and recruiters what was most important to them. We provide a dozen options, such as ‘increase my earnings potential,’ ‘build my professional network,’ and ‘learn how to start or develop a business.’ The U.S. surveys also offered diversity options such as ‘learn in a diverse, equitable and inclusive B-school environment’ and ‘learn how to work successfully in an increasingly diverse workforce.’ Their answers determine the weightings of each of our indexes.”

“Step 2 asks a range of survey questions on the business school experience, each mapped to a specific index. We also collect MBA Career Services & Employer Alliance (MBA CSEA) employment and compensation data from schools. We also collect data on their class members’ race, ethnicity, and gender. Finally, from survey scores and the data, we calculate the overall ranking,” Bloomberg Businessweek elaborated.


• Bloomberg Businessweek’s Best B-Schools 2021-2022 — Overall

• U.S. B-Schools Ranking — Overall


• European B-Schools Ranking — Overall


• Asia-Pacific B-Schools Ranking — Overall


• Canadian B-Schools Ranking — Overall

Source: Bloomberg Businessweek

|GlobalGiants.Com|

Edited & Posted by the Editor | 1:27 PM | View the original post



September 27, 2021

US Embassy North India Director Michael Rosenthal inaugurates US Study Center at Chandigarh University.


US Study center will serve as a coordination office for admissions to US Universities, visa preparation, and NCLX training center.

Indian students are welcome to study in the US; With a sharp mind and brilliant skills, Indians contribute to the development of society and our country says, US Embassy Director NIO Michael Rosenthal.


Chandigarh University


Photo: US Embassy North India Director Michael Rosenthal inaugurated US Study Center at Chandigarh University.


CHANDIGARH, India, Sept. 27, 2021 — American people are learning from Indians by allying with India in various fields, and the people of both countries benefit from multiple alliances. Michael Rosenthal, Director, North India Office (NIO), US Embassy, said. He was speaking during the inaugural ceremony of the US Studies Center at Chandigarh University. Chandigarh University has set up a US Study Center on the campus to create opportunities for students to study in leading academic institutions of America. The study center will prove to be an essential factor in providing long-term and short-term programs to university students, joint research programs, preparation for visa interviews, USA in-house degree programs, and promoting cultural and social exchange between the two countries.

The US has always welcomed students from all over the world, including India. Indian students bring so many skills, ideas, and enthusiasm which helps the people and society of the US, Michael Rosenthal said. He further added, “The collaboration between the US and Indian educational institutions has been growing over the last few years. Students and faculty from both countries are learning from each other through Joint Research and Exchange Program. It reflects the strong academic ties between the US and India.” The relations between India and the USA are not merely ties between two governments, but this relationship is people-driven and people-centric, added Michael Rosenthal.

While speaking on the Indo-US relationship, Michael Rosenthal said, “The US is one of the top trading partners in terms of goods and services for India. The bilateral trade between India and the US has scaled to new heights and touched $ 150 billion in recent time. The United States and India have shared interests in promoting global security, stability, and economic prosperity through trade, investment, and connectivity”. The strong people-to-people ties, educational institutions tie-ups, and scientists of both the nations doing research together is a tremendous source of strength for the Indo-US partnership, added Mr. Rosenthal.

“US Study Center established at the campus of Chandigarh University is a symbol of further improving the relationship between the US and India. This center will facilitate more educational exchanges, more scientific research, and more study opportunities between the students of both the countries,” said Michael Rosenthal. While talking about the New Education Policy of India, Michael Rosenthal said, “India’s New Education Policy opens up new opportunities for collaboration with the foreign countries. India has great minds, faculty, institutions, and research facility. Therefore, many US universities, educational institutes, and individuals are interested in collaborating with Indian universities for various research programs.”

With this newly inaugurated US Study Center, students will enroll in universities in the US with exclusive scholarship facilities. The US Study Center, set up in the university campus, includes the coordination offices of the University of North Alabama and Arkansas State University. The newly inaugurated center will provide an in-house MBA program under the 1+1 plan. Students will study at Chandigarh University Campus for one year and complete the remaining study with scholarship facilities at the University of North Alabama. In addition, the center will offer training and preparation courses for the National Council Licensing Examination (NCLEX) for licensure of nurses in the US, Canada, and Australia. Furthermore, the campus-based center will organize joint conferences, seminars, workshops, and joint research activities in collaboration with partner universities in the US to provide students with world-class knowledge on research and innovation.

Chandigarh University Chancellor Satnam Singh Sandhu said, “To provide world-class employment and quality education to the students, the university has established academic alliances with more than 308 best universities in 68 countries including Canada, USA, Australia, New Zealand, and Europe.” Chandigarh University has tied up with 25 universities in the US so far, and more than 192 its students are already pursuing their studies in the US under various programs.”

Chandigarh University is an autonomous educational institution located near Chandigarh in Punjab, India. It is the youngest University in India and the only private University in Punjab to be honored with an A+ Grade by NAAC (National Assessment and Accreditation Council). CU offers more than 109 undergraduate and postgraduate programs in engineering, management, pharmacy, law, architecture, journalism, animation, hotel management, commerce, and other disciplines.

Source: Chandigarh University

|GlobalGiants.Com|

Edited & Posted by the Editor | 9:02 AM | View the original post



September 24, 2021

QS Graduate Employability Rankings 2022 — The World's Best Universities for Graduate Employment


QS World University Rankings


QS World University Rankings


Photo Buildings at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Campus. Image Credit: Shih-Pei Chang.


LONDON, Sept. 23, 2021 — QS Quacquarelli Symonds, global higher education analysts, have released their annual deep dive into the relationship between university choice and graduate employment outcomes. The result is the 2022 QS Graduate Employability Rankings: an independent list of the world’s top institutions for career-focused students.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology is named global employability leader, achieving perfect scores in three of the five indicators used by QS to compile the table.

The QS Graduate Employability Rankings offer a more granular comparative examination of universities’ work to cultivate propitious pathways into high-quality employment. QS Employability rates Universities on partnerships with employers (including internships), the number of sectoral leaders among their alumni, the frequency with which employers are present on campus, and a location-adjusted graduate employment rate.

As the world recovers from the impact of the pandemic, the importance of graduating with the skills and qualities required by modern employers has never been greater.

Each of the universities ranked here has demonstrated an ability to produce graduates with the ‘soft skills’ required for the modern workplace. However, given the fierce competition for graduate roles worldwide, students should be seriously considering how their university can prepare them adequately for full-time employment by connecting them with global employers and ensuring they develop the necessary skills and knowledge.

If you’re concerned about your future career prospects and wondering which universities are competent to help you succeed, this QS ranking is a great place to start.

Highlights include:

Ben Sowter, Director of Research, QS, said: “Students are becoming increasingly conscious of the competitiveness of the global graduate jobs market and the ever-increasing financial costs of their educational investment. So such independent data must be available to them for making evidence-based decisions about their educational futures. Australian institutions perform better at the top than British ones, and various universities in Latin America and Asia outperform their overall rank. So it is clear that it is valuable to shine a unique light on outstanding employability performance - one that rewards institutions successfully fulfilling this critical aspect of their mission.”

• QS Graduate Employability 2022 Rankings

• Top 100

  1. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Cambridge, United States
  2. Stanford University Stanford, United States
  3. The University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Los Angeles, United States
  4. The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
  5. Harvard University, Cambridge, United States
  6. Tsinghua University, Beijing, China (Mainland)
  7. The University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
  8. The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
  9. Cornell University, Ithaca, United States
  10. The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
  11. University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
  12. Institut Polytechnique de Paris, Palaiseau Cedex, France
  13. University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
  14. Yale University, New Haven, United States
  15. Princeton University, Princeton, United States
  16. New York University (NYU), New York City, United States
  17. National University of Singapore (NUS), Singapore, Singapore
  18. Columbia University, New York City, United States
  19. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
  20. UCL, London, United Kingdom
  21. The University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
  22. ETH Zurich - Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zürich, Switzerland
  23. Peking University, Beijing, China (Mainland)
  24. University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada
  25. The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
  26. Tecnológico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico
  27. University of Michigan-Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, United States
  28. Duke University, Durham, United States
  29. Northwestern University, Evanston, United States
  30. Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
  31. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (UC), Santiago, Chile
  32. The University of New South Wales (UNSW Sydney), Sydney, Australia
  33. Fudan University, Shanghai, China (Mainland)
  34. Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
  35. Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China (Mainland)
  36. Purdue University, West Lafayette, United States
  37. Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan
  38. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, United States
  39. Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
  40. Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, United States
  41. Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China (Mainland)
  42. The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
  43. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
  44. Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
  45. Western University, London, Canada
  46. KIT, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany
  47. University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States
  48. The London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), London, United Kingdom
  49. The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  50. University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
  51. National Taiwan University (NTU), Taipei City, Taiwan
  52. Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
  53. University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
  54. Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
  55. Brown University, Providence, United States
  56. Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
  57. The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, United States
  58. RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
  59. University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States
  60. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
  61. University of Washington, Seattle, United States
  62. University of Technology Sydney, Haymarket, Australia
  63. California Institute of Technology (Caltech), Pasadena, United States
  64. The University of Queensland, Brisbane City, Australia
  65. The University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States
  66. University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
  67. Tokyo Institute of Technology (Tokyo Tech), Tokyo, Japan
  68. King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
  69. The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
  70. KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
  71. The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
  72. Université PSL, France
  73. American University of Beirut (AUB), Beirut, Lebanon
  74. RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia
  75. Korea University, Seoul, South Korea
  76. Osaka University, Osaka City, Japan
  77. KAIST - Korea Advanced Institute of Science & Technology, Daejeon, South Korea
  78. The University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
  79. The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
  80. Boston University, Boston, United States
  81. McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
  82. University of Florida, Gainesville, United States
  83. Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
  84. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Mexico City, Mexico
  85. The Ohio State University, Columbus, United States
  86. Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea
  87. Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
  88. University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
  89. City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR5
  90. Georgetown University, Washington D.C., United States
  91. Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
  92. Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan
  93. University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
  94. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), Madrid, Spain
  95. The University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
  96. Hanyang University, Seoul, South Korea
  97. Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
  98. Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
  99. University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
  100. Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom

• 101-110

• 111-120

• 121-130

• 131-140

• 141-150

• 151-160

• 161-170

• 171-180

• 181-190

• 191-200

• 201-250

• 251-300

• 301-500

• 501+


Source: QS Quacquarelli Symonds

|GlobalGiants.Com|

• Do not confuse ‘QS Graduate Employability 2022 Rankings’ with the regular ‘QS World University Rankings 2022’, which QS has already published (also reported here) on June 9, 2021.

Edited & Posted by the Editor | 2:53 AM | View the original post



September 22, 2021

Wall Street Journal/Times Higher Education U.S. College Rankings 2022


WSJ, THE, College Rankings


WSJ, THE, College Rankings


Photo: The University of Chicago Campus. Image Credit: Corey Seeman.


London/New York, September 22, 2021 — The Wall Street Journal/Times Higher Education U.S. College Ranking uses 15 performance indicators. It strives to answer the questions that matter most to students and their families. For example, how likely am I to graduate, pay off my loans, and get a good job? Does the college have plenty of resources to teach me properly? Would I be engaged and stretched in the classroom and get good access to my teachers? Is there a diverse campus community?

The 2022 ranking includes almost 800 colleges/universities.

Harvard University tops the table for the fifth year in a row. At the same time, Stanford University climbs two places to second, and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Yale University drop one place to third and fourth, respectively.

Johns Hopkins University is the only newcomer in the top 10, ranking at the joint ninth place (up from 11th), while Emory University is the only newcomer in the top 20.

The University of Michigan-Ann Arbor is the top public university for the second year in a row.

One new institution joins the table this year: the United States Military Academy, which ranks 47th.

• The student-focused WSJ/THE College Rankings differ considerably from the THE World University Rankings, which emphasize research excellence on a global scale.

All ranked institutions have an overall score and four pillar scores. However, for each pillar, only institutions ranked in the top 400 overall, or the top 400 in that pillar, have a publicly visible score.

The ranking adopts a balanced scorecard approach, with 15 individual performance indicators combined to create an overall score that reflects the broad strength of the institution.

Data comes from various sources: the U.S. government (Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System - IPEDS), the College Scorecard, the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), the THE US Student Survey, the THE Academic Survey, and the Elsevier bibliometric dataset.

• WSJ/THE Ranking Methodology

The overall methodology explores four key areas:

• Resources (30%)

Does the college have the capacity to deliver teaching effectively? The Resources area represents 30 percent of the overall ranking. Within this, WSJ/THE look at:

• Engagement (20%)

Does the college effectively engage with its students? Most of the data in this area come from the THE US Student Survey. The Engagement area represents 20 percent of the overall ranking. Within this, WSJ/THE look at:

• Outcomes (40%)

Does the college generate reasonable and appropriate outputs? Does it add value to the students who attend? The Outcomes area represents 40 percent of the overall ranking.

Within this, WSJ/THE looks at:

• Environment (10%)

Is the college providing a good learning environment for all students? Does it make efforts to attract a diverse student body and faculty? The Environment area represents 10 percent of the overall ranking. Within this WSJ/THE looks at:


• Wall Street Journal/Times Higher Education U.S. College Rankings 2022

• TOP 100

• 101-200

• 201-300

• 301-400

• 401-500

• 501-600

• > 600


Sources: The Wall Street Journal & Times Higher Education.

|GlobalGiants.Com|



Edited & Posted by the Editor | 12:17 AM | View the original post



September 19, 2021

University Grants Commission (UGC) India asks Universities to promptly attend to Requests/Inquiries concerning Verification/Authentication of Degrees/Diplomas/Certificates awarded by them.


— UPDATED: SEPTEMBER 18, 2021 —

UGC India

UGC India

New Delhi, August 16, 2021, — University Grants Commission (UGC) India has sent a letter to the University Vice-Chancellors. The letter asks them to ensure that their respective institutions pay prompt attention to the requests/inquiries concerning the Verification/Authentication of Degrees/Diplomas/Certificates they have awarded.

UGC has directed the universities to timely respond to all such inquiries in the students’ interest.

Source: University Grants Commission (UGC) India

|GlobalGiants.Com|

………………………………………………..

UGC India

— UPDATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2021 —

• University Grants Commission has sent the following communication to the Vice-Chancellors of all Universities:

Sub: Implementation of Guidelines for Gender Champions in Educational Institutions.

Dear Madam/Sir,

………………………………………………..

Source: University Grants Commission (UGC) India

|GlobalGiants.Com|

Edited & Posted by the Editor | 9:15 AM | View the original post



September 14, 2021

QS Global MBA & Business Masters 2022 — The World's Best Schools and Programs for Future Business Leaders

QS Global MBA Rankings

QS Global MBA Rankings, Stanford University


Photo: Knight Management Center of Stanford Graduate School of Business. Palo Alto, California. Image Credit: Corey Seeman.


LONDON, Sept. 13, 2021 — QS Quacquarelli Symonds, global business school analysts, released their annual suite of rankings identifying the world’s premier study destinations for aspiring future business leaders. The evaluation comprises the QS World University Rankings: Global Full-Time MBA, and a series of specialized high-demand Business Masters Rankings, providing insight to those wishing to undertake a course of study in a career-enhancing qualification in high demand among employers. Stanford GSB is named the world’s number-one MBA, while Harvard Business School rises from 4th to joint-second, shared with The Wharton School.

QS compiles its Business Masters Rankings according to program performance in five key metrics: Employability, Entrepreneurship & Alumni Outcomes, Return on Investment, Thought Leadership, and Class & Faculty Diversity.

• QS Global Full-Time MBA Rankings

• Top 100

  1. Stanford Graduate School of Business, Stanford (CA), United States
  2. Harvard Business School, Boston (MA), United States
  3. Penn (Wharton), Philadelphia (PA), United States
  4. HEC Paris, Jouy en Josas, France
  5. MIT (Sloan), Cambridge (MA), United States
  6. London Business School, London, United Kingdom
  7. IE Business School, Madrid, Spain
  8. INSEAD, Paris/Singapore, France
  9. Columbia Business School. New York (NY), United States
  10. IESE Business School, Barcelona, Spain
  11. UC Berkeley (Haas), Berkeley (CA), United States
  12. Chicago (Booth), Chicago (IL), United Kingdom
  13. Esade Business School, Barcelona, Spain
  14. Oxford (Said), Oxford, United Kingdom
  15. UCLA (Anderson), Los Angeles (CA), United States
  16. Northwestern (Kellogg), Evanston (IL), United States
  17. Cambridge (Judge), Cambridge, United Kingdom
  18. Yale School of Management, New Haven (CT), United States
  19. NYU (Stern), New York (NY), United States
  20. Michigan (Ross), Ann Arbor (MI), United States
  21. Imperial College Business School, London, United Kingdom
  22. Duke (Fuqua), Durham (NC), United States
  23. SDA Bocconi, Milan, Italy
  24. Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen, Denmark
  25. IMD, Lausanne, Switzerland
  26. Melbourne Business School, Melbourne, Australia
  27. ESSEC Business School, Paris & Singapore, France
  28. National University of Singapore (NUS), Singapore, Singapore
  29. Nanyang NTU Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
  30. Erasmus (RSM), Rotterdam, Netherlands
  31. Warwick Business School, Coventry, United Kingdom
  32. Cornell University (Johnson), Ithaca (NY), United States
  33. Boston University (Questrom), Boston (MA), United States
  34. UNSW (AGSM), Sydney, Australia
  35. USC (Marshall), Los Angeles (CA), United States
  36. CEIBS, Shanghai, China (Mainland)
  37. University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, Hong Kong SAR
  38. Mannheim Business School, Mannheim, Germany
  39. University of Texas at Austin (McCombs), Austin (TX), United States
  40. Carnegie Mellon University (Tepper), Pittsburgh (PA), United States
  41. University of Toronto (Rotman), Toronto (ON), Canada
  42. EDHEC Business School, Nice, France
  43. Frankfurt School of Finance & Management, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
  44. Indiana University (Kelley), Bloomington (IN), United States
  45. Indian Institute of Management (IIM) Ahmedabad, Ahmedabad, India
  46. HKUST, Hong Kong SAR, Hong Kong SAR
  47. University of Manchester (Alliance), Manchester, United Kingdom
  48. ESCP Europe, Paris, London, France
  49. Indian Institute of Management Bangalore, Bangalore, India
  50. EGADE Business School, Mexico City, Mexico
  51. Dartmouth College (Tuck), Hanover (NH), United States
  52. The University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
  53. University of Virginia (Darden), Charlottesville (VA), United States
  54. EM Lyon Business School, Lyon, France
  55. University of Edinburgh Business School, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  56. Georgia Tech (Scheller), Atlanta (GA), United States
  57. Georgetown University (McDonough), Washington (DC), United States
  58. WHU (Otto Beisheim), Dusseldorf, Germany
  59. Shanghai Jiao Tong (Antai), Shanghai/Shenzhen/Singapore, China (Mainland)
  60. Emory University (Goizueta), Atlanta (GA), United States
  61. Vlerick Business School, Brussels, Belgium
  62. University of Florida (Warrington), Gainesville (FL), United States
  63. University of Minnesota (Carlson), Minneapolis (MN), United States
  64. Queen’s University (Smith), Kingston (ON), Canada
  65. Texas A&M (Mays), College Station (TX), United States
  66. University of Washington (Foster), Seattle (WA), United States
  67. University of North Carolina (Kenan-Flagler), Chapel Hill (NC), United States
  68. CUHK Business School, Hong Kong SAR, Hong Kong SAR
  69. Fudan University, Shanghai, China (Mainland)
  70. Michigan State University (Eli Broad), East Lansing (MI), United States
  71. Western (Ivey), London (ON), Canada
  72. Monash Business School, Melbourne, Australia
  73. McGill (Desautels), Montreal (QC), Canada
  74. Cranfield School of Management, Cranfield, United Kingdom
  75. IIM Calcutta, Kolkata, India
  76. Vanderbilt (Owen), Nashville (TN), United States
  77. City’s Business School, London, United Kingdom
  78. Durham University Business School, Durham, United Kingdom
  79. AUB (Suliman S. Olayan), Beirut, Lebanon
  80. George Washington, Washington (DC), United States
  81. Rochester (Simon), Rochester (NY), United States
  82. York (Schulich), Toronto (ON), Canada
  83. MGSM Macquarie, Sydney, Australia
  84. Rice (Jones), Houston (TX), United States
  85. UBC (Sauder), Vancouver (BC), Canada
  86. Washington University (Olin), St Louis (MO), United States
  87. Penn State (Smeal), University Park (PS), United States
  88. Politecnico di Milano School of Management, Milan, Italy
  89. ESMT Berlin, Berlin, Germany
  90. TIAS Business School, Tilburg, Netherlands
  91. Indian School of Business, Hyderabad/Mohali, India
  92. Babson College (Olin), Babson Park (MA), United States
  93. INCAE Business School, Alajuela, Costa Rica
  94. UQ Business School, Brisbane, Australia
  95. Ohio State (Fisher), Columbus (OH), United States
  96. Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
  97. North Carolina State (Jenkins), Raleigh (NC), United States
  98. IESEG School of Management, Paris, France
  99. UT Dallas (Naveen), Richardson (TX), United States

• 101-110

• 111-120

• 121-130

• 131-140

• 141-150

• 151-200

• 201-250

Source: QS Quacquarelli Symonds

|GlobalGiants.Com|

Edited & Posted by the Editor | 3:46 PM | View the original post



September 13, 2021

U.S. News & World Report Unveils the 2022 Best U.S. Colleges Rankings


U.S. News & World Report


U.S. News & World Report, Princeton University

Photo: Princeton University. Image Credit: Emil Mondoa.


WASHINGTON, Sept. 13, 2021 — U.S. News & World Report has released the 2022 U.S. News Best Colleges. In its 37th year, the rankings evaluate more than 1,400 colleges and universities on up to 17 measures of academic quality.

“Students and faculty continue to feel the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, whether it’s through remote learning, mask-wearing, or vaccine requirements,” said Kim Castro, editor and chief content officer of U.S. News. “As communities work through these challenges, U.S. News is committed to providing information on the academic quality of institutions across the country, so prospective students and their families can make informed decisions throughout their college search.”

New in this year’s edition of the rankings is the Best Undergraduate Nursing Programs. U.S. News is publishing a brand-new ranking of more than 690 schools with Bachelor’s of Science in Nursing degree programs.

Princeton University is No. 1 among National Universities this year, and Williams College is the top school among National Liberal Arts Colleges. For Top Public Schools, the University of California—Los Angeles ranks No. 1 among National Universities. And the United States Naval Academy is No. 1 for Top Public Schools among National Liberal Arts Colleges.

• 2022 U.S. News & World Report Best Colleges

• National Universities - Top 3

• National Liberal Arts Colleges - Top 3


• Top Public Schools

• National Universities - Top 3

• National Liberal Arts Colleges - Top 3


• Top Performers on Social Mobility

• National Universities - Top 3

• National Liberal Arts Colleges - Top 3


Source: U.S. News & World Report

|GlobalGiants.Com|

Edited & Posted by the Editor | 9:20 AM | View the original post



September 10, 2021

Center for Security in Politics at UC Berkeley Goldman School of Public Policy announces New Working Group to study Digital Remote Voting


The new group will consist of experienced election security and cybersecurity experts, election administrators, and engineers to explore new voting methods that expand the ease and accessibility of voting.

The goal is to engage in an academically rigorous process to evaluate and develop a set of security, accessibility, and election administration standards necessary for vendors and election officials to implement safe and secure digital ballot return options.


UC Berkeley


Photo: Clock Tower, University of California, Berkeley. Image Credit: Keegan Houser.


UC Berkeley, US Voting


Photo: 2020 U.S. Presidential. Countdown to November 2020 Election. Image Credit: GPA Photo Archive / Carol M. Highsmith / Library of Congress. Public Domain. File Photo.



BERKELEY, Calif., September 10, 2021 — Center for Security in Politics (CSP) at the UC Berkeley Goldman School of Public Policy has announced the formation of a new working group to rigorously assess the risks and opportunities associated with digital remote voting. The group will determine the feasibility of technical and implementation standards to enable digital ballots’ safe and secure return. Further, it would develop those standards and, where possible, outline the technologies necessary to meet the criteria.

As part of CSP’s mission to address critical global risks and public policy problems and create actionable solutions for policymakers, the working group will evaluate new methods to make voting more accessible, resilient, and secure for all Americans.

The group will consist of academic researchers, election administrators, cryptographers, and cybersecurity and election security experts. The first meeting took place on August 31, 2021.

“How people think about - and participate - in voting is changing,” said Professor Janet Napolitano, founder and faculty director for the Center for Security in Politics at UC Berkeley. “We cannot turn a blind eye to the lessons of the 2020 election or overlook the voters who face inherent barriers to voting. Instead, we need academically rigorous, evidence-based standards that will guide the development of safe and secure remote balloting technology.”

Recent advances in technology present a historic opportunity to explore new voting methods that could expand the ease and accessibility of voting. The 2020 presidential election cycle made it clear that voters need multiple options to cast their ballots, especially those displaced during a natural disaster, serving in the military, or unable to mark their ballot independently. Remote digital voting could address these barriers and expand access to new voters.

Digital remote voting comes with its own set of challenges, including voter and device authentication and vote verification. The group will study best practices from other countries and analyze the risks, rewards, and trade-offs. Digital remote voting is already available to military and overseas voters in 31 states and disabled voters in 8 states. Still, there are currently no national standards for security and to protect the anonymity of voters’ ballots. Over 330 jurisdictions in 8 states used mobile voting in 2020 during the November federal election.

“The last few years have publicly highlighted what election officials have long known: there are risks in administering elections,” said group convener Mike Garcia. He is a cybersecurity expert who previously ran digital identity at the National Institute of Standards and Technology and has been working with states and localities on election security since 2017.

“There’s been a lot of noise around technologies relating to digital remote voting, both from vendors wanting to sell such technologies and from cybersecurity experts who almost universally oppose them,” says Jeremy Epstein, an expert in voting security. “Very little of the debates have been understandable to policymakers. Having a report from a balanced group of experts can help inform the discussion and give guidance to election officials who are frequently caught in the middle, unsure of the ‘least dangerous’ path forward.”

“There is no one approach to voting that works for everyone in the country,” said Garcia. “Moreover, no individual should forfeit their right to vote because the authorities suddenly call them to fight a wildfire or serve overseas on Election Day. Officials’ experience enables them to manage risk with mail-in ballots and in-person voting successfully. Still, the relative newness and technical nature of digital ballot return demand a focused effort. Digital remote voting is already happening. Now is the time to properly scan its use and provide unbiased guidance on managing risk to ensure it is secure, resilient, and accessible.”

Source: Center for Security in Politics, UC Berkeley Goldman School of Public Policy.

|GlobalGiants.Com|

— The editor holds a certificate in ‘Solving Public Policy Problems’ from UC Berkeley Goldman School of Public Policy.

Edited & Posted by the Editor | 6:28 AM | View the original post



September 8, 2021

Chitkara University Chandigarh Bags A+ NAAC Accreditation


Chitkara University Chandigarh



Chandigarh, India, Sep 08, 2021 — Chitkara University Chandigarh has been awarded a rating of A+ by the prestigious National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC). The rating places it among India’s 5% Higher Education Institutions (HEI) with such a coveted grade.

The Peer Team praised the University for its excellent infrastructure for education innovation and research and neat, clean, green, and well-maintained campus.

Dr. Ashok K Chitkara, Chancellor of Chitkara University, said, “It is the hard work by our students, staff, and faculty for years that resulted in securing this recognition. Moreover, the University has a well-defined research promotion policy which has succeeded in the development of state-of-the-art advanced facilities.”

Pro-Chancellor Dr. Madhu Chitkara expressed her sincere thanks to all stakeholders and said, “We develop the curricula following standardized procedures revised at regular intervals by taking feedbacks from all our stakeholders. We consider the local, regional, and global developmental needs regarding employability and entrepreneurship while designing the course. The experimental, participative, and project-based learning are in practice through blended mode. We have adopted a flexible CBCS (Choice Bases Credit System) that gives freedom to the students to undergo a multidisciplinary approach. The assessment process is well defined to evaluate the attainment level in critical thinking and problem-solving skills.”

Established in 1994, NAAC is an autonomous body of UGC which assesses and accredits Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). NAAC has identified a set of seven criteria to serve as the basis of its assessment procedures: Curricular Aspects; Teaching-learning & Evaluation; Research, Innovations & Extension; Infrastructure & Learning Resources; Student Support & Progression; Governance, Leadership & Management; and Institutional Values & Best Practices.

By studying in a NAAC accredited institution, students get a chance to learn in a cutting-edge environment and earn a degree that would have global recognition. In addition, they get instant identification as an alumnus of a credible institute and get better placement opportunities as the industry prefers hiring students from higher-graded institutions.

Source: Chitkara University Chandigarh

|GlobalGiants.Com|

Edited & Posted by the Editor | 7:36 AM | View the original post



September 3, 2021

Rashtrapati Bhavan invites Applications for Visitor's Awards 2021 from Faculty Members and Students of Central Universities of India.


Visitor Awards India, Rashtrapati Bhavan


Photo: The President of India, Ram Nath Kovind, at the ‘At Home Reception,’ on the occasion of the 72nd Republic Day Celebrations, at Rashtrapati Bhavan, in New Delhi on January 26, 2021. [File Photo]


Visitor Awards India, Rashtrapati Bhavan


Photo: The President of India, Ram Nath Kovind, presenting the 5th Visitor’s Awards, 2019, at the Conference of Vice-Chancellors of Central Universities, at Rashtrapati Bhavan, in New Delhi, December 17, 2019. [File Photo]


Visitor Awards India, Rashtrapati Bhavan


Photo: The President of India, Ram Nath Kovind, addressing the Conference of Vice-Chancellors of Central Universities, at Rashtrapati Bhavan, in New Delhi, December 17, 2019. [File Photo]


New Delhi, India, August 25, 2021 — Rashtrapati Bhavan has invited online applications from faculty members and students of Central Universities of India for the Visitor’s Awards 2021 in the following three categories:

The last date for applying is October 31, 2021.

The Government of India instituted the Visitor’s Awards in 2014 to promote healthy competition amongst Central Universities and motivate them to adopt best practices from around the world in pursuit of excellence.

The President of India, in his capacity as the Visitor of Central Universities, presents the Awards.

The Rashtrapati Bhavan (Presidential Palace) is the official residence of the President of India in New Delhi.

Source: President’s Secretariat, New Delhi

|GlobalGiants.Com|


— UPDATE —

September 3, 2021

• Education Minister of India meets Central Universities Vice-Chancellors •

New Delhi, September 3, 2021 — India’s Education Minister, Dharmendra Pradhan, virtually met the Vice Chancellors of 45 Central Universities under the Ministry of Education on September 3, 2021. It is his first formal meeting with the Central Universities’ Vice-Chancellors in a group.

The items for discussion included:

Source: Ministry of Education

GlobalGiants.Com|

Edited & Posted by the Editor | 4:48 AM | View the original post



September 2, 2021

Times Higher Education (THE) announces World University Rankings 2022; The University of Oxford tops the List.


World University Rankings


World University Rankings


Photo: University of California, Berkeley. A view of the campus from far. Image Credit: Daniel Parks.


London, September 2, 2021 — The Times Higher Education (THE) World University Rankings 2022 include more than 1,600 universities across 99 countries and territories, making them the largest and most diverse university rankings to date.

The ranking table results from 13 carefully calibrated performance indicators that measure an institution’s performance across four areas: teaching, research, knowledge transfer, and international outlook.

Times Higher Education said this year’s ranking analyzed more than 108 million citations across over 14.4 million research publications and included survey responses from almost 22,000 scholars globally. “Overall, we collected over 430,000 data points from more than 2,100 institutions that submitted data,” THE added.

The University of Oxford tops the ranking for the sixth consecutive year. At the same time, mainland China has two institutions in the top 20 for the first time: Peking University and Tsinghua University share 16th place.

Institut Polytechnique de Paris is the highest new entry at 95th place, following a merger of five institutions.

The US is the most-represented country overall, with 183 institutions. It is also the most represented in the top 200 (57). However, its share of universities in this elite group is falling.

Mainland China now has the joint fifth-highest number of institutions in the top 200 (up from joint seventh last year), overtaking Canada and on a par with the Netherlands.

Six new countries feature in the table compared with last year: Azerbaijan, Ecuador, Ethiopia, Fiji, Palestine, and Tanzania.

Harvard University tops the teaching pillar, while the University of Oxford is tops in research.


• Times Higher Education (THE) World University Rankings 2022

TOP 100

  1. University of Oxford — United Kingdom
  2. California Institute of Technology — United States
  3. Harvard University — United States
  4. Stanford University — United States
  5. University of Cambridge — United Kingdom
  6. Massachusetts Institute of Technology — United States
  7. Princeton University — United States
  8. University of California, Berkeley — United States
  9. Yale University — United States
  10. The University of Chicago — United States
  11. Columbia University — United States
  12. Imperial College London — United Kingdom
  13. Johns Hopkins University — United States
  14. University of Pennsylvania — United States
  15. ETH Zurich — Switzerland
  16. Peking University — China
  17. Tsinghua University — China
  18. University of Toronto — Canada
  19. University College London — United Kingdom
  20. University of California, Los Angeles — United States
  21. National University of Singapore — Singapore
  22. Cornell University — United States
  23. Duke University — United States
  24. University of Michigan-Ann Arbor — United States
  25. Northwestern University — United States
  26. New York University — United States
  27. London School of Economics and Political Science — United Kingdom
  28. Carnegie Mellon University — United States
  29. University of Washington — United States
  30. University of Edinburgh — United Kingdom
  31. University of Hong Kong — Hong Kong
  32. LMU Munich — Germany
  33. University of Melbourne — Australia
  34. University of California, San Diego — United States
  35. King’s College London — United Kingdom
  36. The University of Tokyo — Japan
  37. University of British Columbia — Canada
  38. Technical University of Munich — Germany
  39. Karolinska Institute — Sweden
  40. École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne — Switzerland
  41. Paris Sciences et Lettres - PSL Research University Paris — France
  42. Heidelberg University — Germany
  43. KU Leuven — Belgium
  44. McGill University — Canada
  45. Georgia Institute of Technology — United States
  46. Nanyang Technological University, Singapore — Singapore
  47. The University of Texas at Austin — United States
  48. The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign — United States
  49. Chinese University of Hong Kong — Hong Kong
  50. University of Manchester — United Kingdom
  51. Washington University in St Louis — United States
  52. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill — United States
  53. Wageningen University & Research — Netherlands
  54. Australian National University — Australia
  55. The University of Queensland — Australia
  56. Seoul National University — South Korea
  57. Monash University — Australia
  58. University of Sydney — Australia
  59. University of Wisconsin-Madison — United States
  60. Fudan University — China
  61. Kyoto University — Japan
  62. Boston University — United States
  63. University of Southern California — United States
  64. Brown University — United States
  65. University of Amsterdam — Netherlands
  66. The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology — Hong Kong
  67. University of California, Davis — United States
  68. University of California, Santa Barbara — United States
  69. Utrecht University — Netherlands
  70. UNSW Sydney — Australia
  71. Leiden University — Netherlands
  72. Erasmus University Rotterdam — Netherlands
  73. Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin — Germany
  74. Humboldt University of Berlin — Germany
  75. Delft University of Technology — Netherlands
  76. Zhejiang University — China
  77. University of Zurich — Switzerland
  78. University of Tübingen — Germany
  79. University of Warwick — United Kingdom
  80. University of Groningen — Netherlands
  81. McMaster University — Canada
  82. Emory University — United States
  83. Free University of Berlin — Germany
  84. Shanghai Jiao Tong University — China
  85. Ohio State University (Main campus) — United States
  86. University of Glasgow — United Kingdom
  87. University of Minnesota — United States
  88. University of Montreal — Canada
  89. University of Science and Technology of China — China
  90. Sorbonne University — France
  91. Hong Kong Polytechnic University — Hong Kong
  92. University of Bristol — United Kingdom
  93. University of Maryland, College Park — United States
  94. Michigan State University — United States
  95. Institut Polytechnique de Paris — France
  96. University of Copenhagen — Denmark
  97. Ghent University — Belgium
  98. University of California, Irvine — United States
  99. Dartmouth College — United States
  100. Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) — South Korea


The University of Oxford remains at the top of the table, retaining the top spot for an impressive sixth consecutive year.

In a year dominated by the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic, the rankings reflect the vital role of universities in understanding and managing the crisis. Many institutions worldwide saw significant boosts in their citation scores (a measure of a university’s research influence and impact in spreading new knowledge and ideas) from Covid-19 focused research.

Professor Louise Richardson, Vice-Chancellor of the University of Oxford, said: ‘My colleagues and I are delighted to have achieved the top ranking again. There are many excellent universities around the world, and we are proud to be in their company.

‘This past year has demonstrated to our public, governments, and even ourselves how much universities can contribute to society. For example, 170 countries are using the vaccine Oxford developed.’


Source: Times Higher Education

|GlobalGiants.Com|


— The Editor holds various certifications from several of the above TOP 100 — The University of Oxford, Harvard University, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, University of California Berkeley, Cornell University, University of Michigan, Delft University of Technology Netherlands, and Dartmouth College.

Edited & Posted by the Editor | 7:34 AM | View the original post



August 28, 2021

Prof. Philip Kotler, "The Father of Marketing," inaugurates International TechInvent-2021 at Chandigarh University.


“Digital Markets have provided more access to smaller companies and offered more variety to the consumers,” — Prof. Philip Kotler.

Companies that fail to innovate with time get vanished from the market.” — Prof. Philip Kotler.


Chandigarh University


Chandigarh, India, August 28, 2021 — “Multinational companies all over the world have to strategize by making futuristic products and technologies available to the customers with changing times. Companies that fail to innovate are slowly extinct from the market,” said world-renowned author and Father of Modern Marketing, Prof. Philip Kotler, during the inauguration ceremony of the TechInvent 2021 organized by Chandigarh University.

Budding technocrats from all over India are participating in the month-long virtual TechInvent. Students from technical, state, central, and private universities and colleges compete to grab exciting cash rewards worth Rs 20 Lakhs.

Dr. Waldemar A. Pfoertsch, Prof. Emeritus for International Business at Pforzheim University, Germany, Dr. Anil Sahasrabudhe, Chairman AICTE, and Anantha Duraiappah, Director UNESCO MGIEP, were amongst the dignitaries who were present during the inauguration ceremony. While delivering his inaugural address to the students, Prof. Kotler said, “The emergence of digital marketing has opened up new avenues for the smaller companies. But, on the other hand, it has offered access to more variety for the consumers. Marketing 5.0 has just introduced the idea of using Artificial Intelligence to understand the consumers’ mood and requirement.” He further said that today when we go online shopping, the search algorithm used by the digital platforms shows results based on historical consumer behavior. While stressing using the mixed blend of traditional and modern marketing methods, Prof. Kotler said, “The traditional marketing techniques are based on consumer experience while the modern-day digital marketing techniques are based on historical consumer behavior.”

Dr. Waldemar A. Pfoertsch said, “Young and inquisitive minds help build the technology-driven products that are the future of the global markets. For example, suppose we see the technological advancements during the last decade. In that case, we will find that most of them have been the brainchild of youth innovators who, through their futuristic vision, have put their expertise in the development of products that we are using today.” Dr. Waldemar further added that universities and higher institutions play a critical role in breeding the next generation of innovators. The student community must learn the art of practically applying the theoretical concepts studied in the classroom.

TechInvent 2021 is an attempt to provide an international platform to the students to show their technical skills and allow them to learn new technologies from industry experts. The month-long TechInvent 2021 at Chandigarh University would organize more than fifty events in engineering, business management, mass communication, hotel management, fine arts, law, sciences and technology, fashion designing, industrial design, and architecture. The final rounds would be on 3rd and 4th September 2021.

Dr. R.S Bawa, Pro-Chancellor, Chandigarh University, said, “We have organized 42 Flagship Events, 21 International Workshops, 6 National Level Conferences, and 3 Entrepreneurship Summits during the month-long National level TechInvent 2021. Dignitaries from the Ministry of Power, Ministry of Earth Sciences, UNESCO, PEDA, AICTE, Asian Climate Change Education Centre participated. At the same time, representatives from more than 20 industries interacted with the students during the International Level TechInvent.”

Source: Chandigarh University

|GlobalGiants.Com|


Prof. Philip Kotler is an American marketing author, consultant, and professor. He was the S. C. Johnson & Son Distinguished Professor of International Marketing at the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University (1962-2018). He is known for popularizing the definition of the marketing mix. He is the author of over 80 books, including Marketing Management, Principles of Marketing, Kotler on Marketing, Marketing Insights from A to Z, Marketing 4.0, Marketing Places, Marketing of Nations, Chaotics, Market Your Way to Growth, Winning Global Markets, Strategic Marketing for Health Care Organizations, Social Marketing, Social Media Marketing, My Adventures in Marketing, Up and Out of Poverty, and Winning at Innovation. — Editor


An A+ Career begins only at an A+ University


Edited & Posted by the Editor | 7:59 AM | View the original post



Start from HOME Go to Top


TRANS WORLD EXPORTS